SecurePath Wayne Howlett

SECURITY

Security Snapshot

Public-safe documentation of how SecurePath is designed — threats, controls, and how each control is verified.

Security ArchitectureAPI SecurityCloud / IAMZero TrustThreat ModelingDetection & ResponseEvidence-first
Standard used across this site: Threats → Controls → Verification.
Snapshot

Core controls and how they’re proven

These sections summarize the defensive design choices behind SecurePath. Each block is written to be expandable as more labs and artifacts are published.

Public-safeEvidence-first

Trust Boundaries

Snapshot

Where trust changes and controls must be enforced.

  • User/device → application entry (identity + session controls)
  • UI → API boundary (authz, validation, rate limits)
  • API → data boundary (least privilege, encryption, auditing)
  • Admin / privileged access (MFA, conditional access, approvals)
  • Third-party integrations (tokens, webhooks, scoped permissions)
  • CI/CD → runtime boundary (secrets, build artifacts, deployment permissions)
Threats → Controls → VerificationEvidence-first

Top Risks

Snapshot

The most common failure modes I design against.

  • Over-permissioned IAM roles
  • Broken authorization / IDOR
  • Token leakage
  • Misconfigurations
  • Insufficient logging for IR
  • Unsafe defaults (open access, weak headers, permissive CORS)
Threats → Controls → VerificationEvidence-first

Core Controls

Snapshot

Controls I prioritize for real-world coverage (not checkbox security).

  • Identity-first: MFA + least privilege + scoped roles
  • Segmentation + firewall rules (trust boundary enforcement)
  • Secure API patterns: validation, authz checks, consistent errors
  • Centralized logging + alerting (high-signal events)
  • Patch & vulnerability workflow: scan → fix → verify
Threats → Controls → VerificationEvidence-first

Verification & Evidence

Snapshot

Proof that controls were implemented and verified.

  • Lab reports: what/why/result with screenshots
  • Config evidence: firewall rules, hardening changes, logging settings
  • Scan results and remediation notes (before/after)
  • Writeups mapped to frameworks (CIS Controls / MITRE ATT&CK where relevant)
  • Architecture notes: scope, assumptions, non-goals, risks
Threats → Controls → VerificationEvidence-first

How to explore SecurePath security

Use this page for high-level control intent. For deeper proof, jump into projects and skills — that’s where the artifacts live (configs, screenshots, writeups, and verification notes).